Southern Patriots love God, Family and Country,  carry a pocket knife and exercise their second amendment right.

Here is the latest News That Matters

The Brewing Storm: How Brazil Tariffs Could Spike Coffee Prices in the U.S.

Southern Patriot Network Staff
July 15,  2025

On July 9, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump announced a 50% tariff on all Brazilian imports, set to take effect on August 1, 2025, citing political tensions with Brazil’s leadership and its legal actions against former President Jair Bolsonaro. As Brazil is the world’s largest coffee producer and supplies about 30% of the U.S. coffee market, this move has sent shockwaves through the global coffee industry. With coffee prices already at historic highs due to climate-related supply constraints, the proposed tariffs could significantly increase costs for American consumers, roasters, and cafes. This article explores the potential impact of these tariffs on coffee prices, the broader market dynamics, and what it means for your morning brew.

The Current State of Coffee Prices

Coffee prices have been on a steep upward trajectory in recent years, driven by environmental challenges and supply chain disruptions. In May 2025, the average retail price for a pound of ground roast coffee in the U.S. reached $7.93, up from $5.99 the previous year, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. This surge was fueled by droughts and frosts in Brazil and Vietnam, the world’s top coffee exporters, which reduced harvests and tightened global supplies. Earlier in 2025, coffee bean futures hit all-time highs, with arabica prices climbing 4.03% to a 1.5-week high on July 14 due to ongoing dry conditions in Brazil’s Minas Gerais region.

The U.S., the world’s largest coffee consumer, imports 99% of its coffee, with Brazil supplying roughly 8.1 million 60-kg bags in 2024, accounting for one-third of total U.S. consumption. Domestic production, primarily from Hawaii and Puerto Rico, meets less than 1% of demand, making the U.S. heavily reliant on imports. With coffee already described as “sky-high” by industry analysts, the proposed tariffs threaten to exacerbate an already strained market.

How Tariffs Could Impact Coffee Prices

The 50% tariff on Brazilian imports, if implemented, would significantly increase the cost of coffee beans entering the U.S. Unlike earlier tariffs set at 10% in April 2025, the new rate represents a sharp escalation, described by Marcos Matos, executive director of Brazil’s coffee exporters council (Cecafé), as a “serious escalation” that could harm both Brazilian exporters and U.S. consumers. Industry experts estimate that wholesale coffee costs could rise by up to 50%, potentially translating to a $0.25 increase per cup for consumers.

For context, a single container of Brazilian coffee, valued at approximately $150,000 at current market prices, would incur an additional $75,000 in tariffs, a cost borne by U.S. importers like Royal Coffee. These costs are likely to ripple through the supply chain, affecting roasters, cafes, and retail brands. Major companies like J.M. Smucker (owner of Folgers and Dunkin’ brands), Keurig Dr Pepper, Starbucks, and Dutch Bros, which source 22–56% of their coffee from Brazil, are expected to face significant cost pressures. Giuseppe Lavazza, chairman of Italian roaster Lavazza, warned that the tariffs could create “a lot of inflation” for an industry already under stress.

Social media posts on X reflect consumer frustration, with one user noting a 35% price spike in Costco’s decaf coffee (from $16.69 to $22.49) attributed to the tariffs, and another predicting a $3.75 price for a 16-ounce coffee if the tariffs persist. While these claims are anecdotal, they underscore growing public concern about rising costs.

Potential Mitigation Strategies and Challenges

Coffee companies may attempt to mitigate the tariff’s impact by sourcing beans from alternative countries like Colombia, Honduras, Peru, or Vietnam. However, these options come with challenges. Michael Nugent, a senior coffee broker at MJ Nugent & Co., noted that while the U.S. could buy from other producers, they cannot match Brazil’s volume or price competitiveness. Brazil’s dominance in arabica coffee production, coupled with its cost-effective robusta (conilon) beans, makes it a critical supplier.

Switching suppliers is not straightforward. Coffee beans have distinct flavor profiles, and specialty roasters, who prioritize high-quality, single-origin beans, may struggle to find substitutes that meet consumer expectations. Additionally, tariffs on other coffee-producing countries—such as Vietnam (20%), Indonesia (32%), and India (27%)—limit the availability of affordable alternatives. A U.S.-based trading house director pointed out that Brazil’s coffee offers “way better value” compared to more expensive origins, making a shift in sourcing costly and complex.

Another mitigation tactic is lobbying for exemptions. The National Coffee Association and other industry groups have been pushing, so far unsuccessfully, to exempt coffee from tariffs, arguing that every $1 of coffee imports generates $43 for the U.S. economy through value-added processing like roasting. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick suggested in June 2025 that exemptions might be considered for commodities like coffee that cannot be produced domestically in sufficient quantities. However, with the August 1 deadline looming, no exemptions have been confirmed, and negotiations between Brazil and the U.S. remain uncertain.

Broader Market and Consumer Impacts

The tariffs could disrupt global coffee trade dynamics. Brazilian exporters, facing a 50% tariff, may redirect their coffee to other markets like Europe or China, potentially leaving the U.S. with reduced supply and higher prices. This redirection could also raise the global pricing floor, as suppliers in countries like Colombia or Vietnam might increase prices to capitalize on demand, according to Tom Madrecki of the Consumer Brands Association.

For consumers, the impact is already tangible. Roasters like Fuego Coffee Roasters in Rochester, N.Y., reported paying $5.50 per pound for midrange Brazilian beans in March 2025, more than double the cost from September 2024. Small businesses, like Cafe Grumpy in Brooklyn, are contemplating price hikes of around 10%, with a cappuccino potentially rising from $5.25 to $5.78. Larger chains may absorb some costs initially but are likely to pass them on if tariffs persist. Keurig Dr Pepper’s CEO indicated in April 2025 that additional price hikes might be considered, while J.M. Smucker warned investors of profit pressures due to rising commodity costs.

Political and Economic Context

The tariffs are partly motivated by political tensions, with Trump citing Brazil’s legal actions against Jair Bolsonaro as a “witch hunt.” This has drawn criticism for politicizing trade policy, with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva vowing reciprocal tariffs, which could further complicate trade relations. Brazil’s agribusiness caucus highlighted that the tariffs impact not only coffee but also orange juice, beef, and ethanol, potentially affecting U.S. consumers’ breakfast costs broadly.

Economists warn that the tariffs could exacerbate inflation, already a concern after years of rising coffee prices. The U.S. had a trade surplus with Brazil of $7.4 billion in 2024, undermining claims of unfair trade practices. Meanwhile, Brazil’s coffee exporters, like Cecafé, argue that the tariffs hurt American jobs and consumers as much as Brazilian farmers, given the U.S.’s reliance on imported coffee.

What’s Next?

The coffee industry faces an uncertain future as the August 1 deadline approaches. If exemptions are granted or Brazil negotiates a deal with the U.S., the impact could be mitigated. However, without such measures, consumers should brace for higher prices at cafes and grocery stores. Roasters may explore blends or alternative origins, but these adjustments will take time and likely come at a premium.

For now, coffee drinkers may want to stock up on their favorite beans or consider brewing at home to offset rising cafe costs. As one X user lamented, “With all these changes in coffee, maybe we should open our own damn farm.” While that’s a humorous exaggeration, it reflects the frustration many Americans feel as their daily coffee habit becomes an increasingly expensive luxury.

Epstein Case Sparks Political Firestorm: New Tensions in Trump Administration

By Southern Patriot Network

Washington, D.C., July 12, 2025 — The Jeffrey Epstein case has reignited controversy this week, with fresh developments exposing deep divisions within the Trump administration and fueling public skepticism. A recent Department of Justice (DOJ) memo, coupled with internal disputes and persistent conspiracy theories, has thrust the disgraced financier’s case back into the national spotlight.

On July 7, 2025, the DOJ and FBI released a concise two-page report concluding their review of Epstein’s case files, reaffirming that the financier, who died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, did not maintain a so-called “client list” of influential figures. The report also upheld the official ruling of suicide, dismissing long-standing theories of foul play. However, a missing minute in the accompanying surveillance footage, attributed to a “technical glitch,” has drawn scrutiny. Video forensics experts noted the footage appears to be compiled from multiple MP4 files, with metadata showing saves on May 23, 2025, raising questions about its integrity despite no evidence of tampering.

The DOJ’s findings have triggered a political maelstrom within the Trump administration. Attorney General Pam Bondi, who in February 2025 claimed on Fox News that a “client list” was on her desk, faced backlash after clarifying she meant broader case files. This reversal has strained relations with FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, who reportedly clashed with Bondi and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles in a tense July 9 meeting. Bongino, a vocal skeptic of the official Epstein narrative, was absent from work on July 11, prompting speculation of resignation, though he remains in his role. FBI Director Kash Patel, another critic of past case handling, is rumored to be considering stepping down in support of Bongino.

President Donald Trump has publicly backed Bondi, downplaying the controversy during a July 8 Cabinet meeting with remarks dismissing Epstein as a “creep.” These comments have alienated some supporters, particularly within the MAGA base, who view the administration’s failure to release promised documents as a betrayal. Conservative commentator Tucker Carlson, speaking at Turning Point USA’s Student Action Summit on July 11, amplified conspiracy theories, alleging Epstein’s ties to Israeli intelligence and a broader elite cover-up. Similar sentiments from figures like Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon have warned of potential electoral fallout, with Bannon suggesting the GOP could lose significant MAGA support in the 2026 midterms.

Meanwhile, Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s associate serving a 20-year sentence, remains incarcerated at FCI Tallahassee. Recent images from July 10 show her jogging in the prison yard, while her appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn her conviction is pending. The release of 2006 grand jury transcripts earlier this year revealed prosecutors’ early knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, intensifying criticism of the justice system’s handling of his 2008 plea deal.

Public reaction, particularly on platforms like X, reflects widespread frustration. Conspiracy theorists, including Alex Jones, have seized on the missing surveillance footage and metadata discrepancies to question the DOJ’s narrative. The Epstein case continues to captivate and divide, with no resolution in sight as demands for transparency clash with official conclusions.

President Trump Announces 30% Tariffs on EU and Mexico in Letters Posted July 11, 2025

By Southern Patriot Network Staff

BRIDGEWATER, N.J. — On July 11, 2025, President Donald J. Trump escalated his trade agenda by announcing new 30% tariffs on goods imported from the European Union and Mexico, set to take effect on August 1, 2025. The announcement came in the form of letters addressed to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, posted on Trump’s social media platform, Truth Social, late Friday evening.

In his letter to the EU, Trump cited the United States’ significant trade deficit with the 27-member bloc—$235.6 billion in 2024, according to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative—as a primary justification for the tariffs. He described the EU’s tariff and non-tariff policies as creating “long-term, large, and persistent trade deficits” that threaten U.S. economic and national security. “Our relationship has been, unfortunately, far from reciprocal,” Trump wrote, demanding that the EU provide “complete, open market access” to U.S. goods with no tariffs to reduce the deficit.

The letter to Mexico focused on both trade imbalances and the ongoing fentanyl crisis. Trump acknowledged Mexico’s efforts to curb undocumented migration and drug trafficking, noting, “Mexico has been helping me secure the border.” However, he added, “what Mexico has done is not enough,” accusing the country of failing to stop cartels from turning North America into a “narco-trafficking playground.” The tariffs, he stated, aim to address these issues while incentivizing manufacturing within the U.S., with Trump offering tariff exemptions for companies that build or manufacture products in the United States.

The announcement follows a week of tariff-related letters sent to over two dozen countries, including a 35% tariff threat to Canada on Thursday, signaling a broader push to reshape global trade relationships. Unlike the Canada letter, which specified that tariffs would apply only to non-USMCA-compliant goods, Trump’s letters to the EU and Mexico indicated that the 30% rate would apply to all imports, excluding specific “sectoral tariffs” like the existing 25% auto tariff and 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum.

International Reactions

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen responded swiftly, expressing disappointment over the tariff announcement. “A 30% tariff on EU exports would hurt businesses, consumers, and patients on both sides of the Atlantic,” she stated on X, reaffirming the EU’s commitment to dialogue but warning that the bloc is prepared to adopt “proportionate countermeasures” if necessary. French President Emmanuel Macron echoed this sentiment, urging the European Commission to prepare “credible countermeasures” by mobilizing all available instruments, including anti-coercion measures, if no agreement is reached by August 1.

Mexican Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard revealed that a Mexican delegation had been informed of the impending tariff letter during a Friday meeting with U.S. officials. “We stated that this was unfair treatment and that we disagreed,” Ebrard posted on X, emphasizing that Mexico has begun negotiations to find an alternative that protects businesses and jobs on both sides of the border. President Sheinbaum, while avoiding direct criticism of Trump, expressed confidence in ongoing talks to mitigate the tariffs’ impact.

Economic and Political Context

The tariffs represent a continuation of Trump’s “America First” trade policy, a cornerstone of his 2024 campaign, which promised to address perceived imbalances in global trade. Earlier this year, Trump imposed a 10% baseline tariff on most trading partners on April 2, dubbed “Liberation Day,” followed by higher rates on specific countries and products. A 90-day pause on many of these tariffs was extended to August 1, but with few new trade deals finalized—only preliminary agreements with the UK and Vietnam—the administration has now moved forward with the new rates.

Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum, criticized the lack of progress in trade negotiations, suggesting that the letters indicate a failure to engage in serious talks over the past three months. “They’re spending time talking to each other about what the future is going to look like, and we’re left out,” he said, noting that nations are focusing on minimizing their exposure to the U.S. economy.

The EU, the U.S.’s largest trading partner with $605 billion in imports in 2024, faces significant disruption, particularly in pharmaceuticals, autos, and machinery. European carmakers like Volkswagen, which rely heavily on Mexican and European manufacturing, are among the most vulnerable. In Mexico, the tariffs could strain the benefits of the USMCA, which allows duty-free trade for compliant goods, though Trump’s letter did not clarify whether USMCA exemptions would remain.

Potential Impacts and Legal Challenges

Economists warn that the tariffs could raise costs for U.S. consumers, with Goldman Sachs estimating that 20% of tariff costs are passed on to consumers through higher prices. The move has also rattled global markets, with investors bracing for potential retaliatory measures and trade war escalation. A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments on July 31 regarding the legality of Trump’s earlier “emergency” tariffs, with a May ruling by the Court of International Trade suggesting that the president may have exceeded his authority.

Trump’s letters also included a warning that any retaliatory tariffs from the EU or Mexico would be met with additional U.S. tariff hikes, escalating the stakes. “Whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added onto the 30% that we charge,” he wrote, a tactic he has used in letters to other nations like Brazil, where a 50% tariff was tied to political grievances.

As the August 1 deadline approaches, both the EU and Mexico have signaled their intent to continue negotiations to avoid the tariffs. However, with Trump’s aggressive trade stance showing no signs of softening, the global economy faces a period of heightened uncertainty.

Sources: NPR, CNN Business, The Guardian, ABC News, Reuters, CNBC, The New York Times, Bloomberg, The Washington Post, NBC News, POLITICO, Fox Business, UPI